This Developer's Life 1.04 - Being Mean
I blogged a few weeks ago about a new developer podcast called "This Developer's Life" spearheaded by Rob Conery. If you've listened, you may have noticed that I've been on the last three shows. Rob and I have officially teamed up and are working on this show together. I love working with Rob (he worked for me for a minute during his time at Microsoft) and we're non-technical creative collaborators on this wonderful venture.
Between us, we'll bring you stories from the mouths of real people, some you know and some you don't.
Over the last month, lots has happened, including some interesting, but friendly, calls with the This American Life folks. They've given us tacit approval to use the "This Developer's Life" name, but they reserve the option to ask us to change it later. A very reasonable agreement as we're clearly a "tribute band" in a niche area, and we appreciate their patience!
We just released episode 1.0.4, but as I assume most of you haven't stumbled on our little show, here's the last four episodes of http://thisdeveloperslife.com.
Don't forget, you can subscribe via RSS, via iTunes or via Zune.
1.0.4 - Being Mean.
What makes people mean in our industry? What about aggressive? Confident? What's the difference? Would you rather have a drill sergeant for a boss, or a zen master? We talk to Cyra Richardson and Giles Bowkett.
1.0.3 - Problems.
How do you solve problems as a developer? How do you tackle issues that seem completely unsolvable - as an individual or on a team? Mike Moore, Javier Lozano, Tamar Cohen and trouble.
1.0.2 - Fame.
Is fame useful for a developer? Should you make a plan and become Internet Famous? Is there value and how does notoriety happen? John Sheehan joins me in the storytelling.
1.0.1 - Getting Fired.
It eventually happens to everyone. The real question is, how do you deal with it when it happens to you? Oren Eini and Sara Chipps explore and share.
Enjoy http://thisdeveloperslife.com.
About Scott
Scott Hanselman is a former professor, former Chief Architect in finance, now speaker, consultant, father, diabetic, and Microsoft employee. He is a failed stand-up comic, a cornrower, and a book author.
About Newsletter
I have one question: How much time in average do you spend in each episode (planning, recording, editing...)?
Looking forward for the next episode.
That's not an indictment of you or the podcast. I don't know why, but I struggle to remember to listen to podcasts - I guess the technology and I haven't found our bridge yet (like Google Reader bridged blogs for me, maybe Google Listen will do the same for podcasts).
The relevance here is in expressing my hope that you too, Scott Hanselman, do not get suckered into chasing the technology future and lose all track of the present. I suspect you're a decade of maturity greater than Rob, but sometimes, I do have my doubts.
Sorry for being such a downer, but this particular topic annoys me.
The podcast is interesting, I've listened to the first three episodes. A few constructive comments though:
1) The audio seems to be very low. It is clear, but I find that I need to turn up my speakers very high to hear it. Then when I listen to another podcast -- .NETRocks, Hanselminutes, RunAs, or whastever, the volume is way too high!
2) There have been a few instancs where nobody was talking, no music, and basically a 5-10 sec pause in the middle of a transition or something. This needs to be shortened.
3) I like the music and whatnot, but it seems almost excessive and definitely too long. I like the format, it just needs to be streamlined. Don't forget, "We're all too busy to listen to podcasts!!!"
Otherwise, keep up the good work!
Keith - We've changed the logo. Agreed that was too much. As for "note for note replication," we're learning. TAL was a good starting point, but the show will evolve into its own thing.
So maybe you should have a follow-up discussion on "When does a little celebrity turn to notoriety?" I should get a writing credit for that episode...but that will just make me mildly famous, which will go to my head, and you can follow the trail from there...
Constructive Criticism == A little shorter on the music filled dramatic pauses. Before giving this critique I thought about how I'd stitch together a similar program - and I'm sure I'd do a FAR worse job than you. So I'm really just trying to make it better.
M@
@Jim - Fair Use is a long-standing issue that is the deepest shade of gray there is. Theft is a bit harsh and I might even add uncalled for. I did a ton of research into the matter and so far all I could find is precisely what I wrote about in that post: if you do something derivative for pay... you're in trouble.
It could very well be that I'm in trouble too, and to play it safe I'm thinking I should redo the old shows (I might just do that).
http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Podcasting_Legal_Guide#Fair_Use_Under_Copyright_Law_And_Its_Application_To_Podcasts.
The part that struck me was the discussion of intro/outro music.
Example 2: A podcaster uses the copyrighted music of pianist George Winston for the intros and outros of her podcast that is about yoga and meditation. The podcast has nothing to do with commenting or critiquing the music played. Conclusion: This is likely not a fair use.
Most podcasts include the intro/outro music of either a well known or a not-well known piece of music. I've heard things like "30 second clips are OK to include", but I haven't found any cases where a podcaster was sued for copyright infringement of the song clips included in their podcast.
I think Rob is in the clear here...but knowing how the music industry is with regards to the consumers of it's product...I too would reconsider.
Love TAL and I like your show. Agree with some of the audio comments about levels/length. Also, one of the things that makes TAL so great is that the stories are from common everyday people.
I like that you're getting an overall theme running through the show. Btw, future show idea, "Growing - how have you grown/matured as a developer".
Anyways, keep up the good work and thanks, I'm sure the production effort to edit the show is probably not easy. :)
Also - @jimdanby - with respect to suing me in a heart beat... you'd probably lose. The main reason is there's nothing to sue me for; I don't make any money, haven't changed the intent/contribution of your music, and moreover I could prove quite readily that I'm actually benefitting your copyright by linking to a distribution of your music... wherein you GET PAID.
All of this said - for the longer pieces I use Royalty free stuff (NIN Ghosts, the Magnatune stuff) and I've started trimming the other clips to 30 seconds or so but will likely move off. I think I'm going to be proactive on this and contact RIAA to see what I can do to keep this a happy home.
If people want something else, they should go find a different show or stop listening. If you started trying to please everybody, I'd quickly do the latter.
Comments are closed.