A Toy Train for Z
We love bargains. We shop a lot at Goodwill, a local thrift shop where folks donate their old stuff. Sometimes you can find some amazing deals. I got an iPod Car Kit once, still in the original packaging, for $2. This evening we stopped by after dinner and while Z was running around bumping into things, he bumped into and knocked over a non-descript box.
Inside was a huge set of wooden trains and many feet of track - nearly a complete set. This is the kind of high-quality toy that costs $50-$100. I've always wanted to get Z a kit like this, but they are just too expensive to justify. It was only $9, so I had to pick it up.
We watched the news while I set up the tracks...as I was getting finished I revelled in the deal. I just love saving money and finding a fantastic thing like this, especially when I know Z will have fun with in in the morning.
I started putting it together and my wife wondered if I bought the train for myself or for Z. I began to take some pictures of the setup...
...and this story came on the news, literally as I was taking photos of the layout...I turned and took a picture.
...crap. You ever have one of those days?
How would one recall a piece of software...just release a patch? What if it were such a bad piece of software that it hurt babies? What a nightmare for these people.
About Scott
Scott Hanselman is a former professor, former Chief Architect in finance, now speaker, consultant, father, diabetic, and Microsoft employee. He is a failed stand-up comic, a cornrower, and a book author.
About Newsletter
If I had to take it away from him, I don't think we'd be able to survice what followed. I've forwarded the info about the recall onto our local consumer advice agency, and hopefully they'll check with the company that imports the toys into New Zealand.
Although Marcus is too old to likely chew on the toys (the most likely the lead could affect the child), I really hope the ones they distribute down here are in an unaffected batch.
That said, recalling a web app isn't too difficult.
As far as recalling of software, I guess the approach varies depending on the type of software you're building.
As for software recalls, the FDA issued a recall for two algorithms used by LASIK machines in the past month or so, according to the RISKS digest.
Before you know Z will be trying to make your "old" P4 Duo Core Vista machine run better because it is just too darn slow to be really effective.
Phillip
You would think they would know about lead paint for child's product = bad before using it.
And to Raj: Sanding would be worse as the particles would become airborne!!! Don't sand it. Follow the recall or buy the unpainted versions of Thomas.
Win98 for Lasik. That sounds scarry!
I am being serious. I grew up poor. It was an event to get something cool.
I like Goodwill because I can donate things that still have some use but that I no longer need. Someone else can buy this stuff for a decent price (or maybe I'll find something useful while I'm there), and the whole process is supporting the Goodwill mission of providing jobs. It's less fuss than a garage sale and it does more good in the long run.
You can find out more about Goodwill Industries and their mission on their site.
We're blessed with a lot of Thomas set pieces we've inherited or purchased. The recall is mostly for James the engine pieces. Our son is actually excited to be getting new ones! And he's 4, so we're not really concerned about chewing. But there's no sense in taking chances.
Did you catch this article in the New York Times? A Lesson That Thomas Could Teach?
It's a good read about the dangers of outsourcing at several levels.
We've still not mailed our box of James pieces.
Comments are closed.
I've almost been through the software equivilant (so excuse the anon). My first job involved writing fitness testing software. Anyone that's been to a big gym and been tested will probably know about Max VO2 tests, you strap on a heart rate monitor, peddle a bike against an increasing load. On the results of that we output an exercise program.
And then someone had a heart attack.
From a purely selfish point of view we were worried. The gym was sued by the "victim's" family, who in turn blamed us. The courts were involved, there was fear over jobs as well as the natural worry you did cause it. It turns out the gym had overridden our recommendations (hurrah for audit trails) and thus had increased the risk; our prescribed program would have been gentler.
The point of the ramble is that after this it wasn't the same. We had based everything on recommendations of various experts and doctors, and none of the developers knew enough about the detail to question it; but there was always a nagging worry.
I was much happier when I left and did database work that had no potential to hurt anyway.