Scott Hanselman

Be afraid, be very afraid.

Don't forget to download MVC Contrib for Windsor, Spring, StructureMap, and ObjectBuilder controller factories as well as Brail, nVelocity, Xslt, and nHaml view engines.

Thanks Bill, I'll show those tonight!

Any chance this talk is being video recorded? I think this topic is right online with a good majority of asp.net developers. Love to view if so.

YES! Please video tape if possible. Thanks!

I third the request :)

I fourth the request :). Please, please, please video tape it

An earlier notice would have helped. Some of us don't read the blog everyday. I also thought Padnug meetings occur during the last week of the month.

Sorry Abdu, they are usually the first Tuesday - http://www.padnug.org but I'll try to post earlier. You could also add Rich Claussen's blog to your feeds, as he blogs all local developer events in Portland.

I assume you meant January *2008*, not 2007.

I currently have an MVC implementation in my applications where controllers fill IViews. I have seen these MVC presentations a couple of times but can't find a reason to switch to the one presented. It seems you have to write a lot more code and take care of postbacks quit a bit yourself. In a pure MVC implementation it would not matter whether the presentation of the view is done on a web page or winforms. The simple editing of grid line items just seems to become difficult with this MS implementation or may be I am missing something or need to see a more complete real world example before the my light bulb lights up. You mentioned that this would be used by 10-15% of the people. I think the message should be that everyone should try to implement MVC because it is better way to structure code especially for large projects. You could also have another implementation of MVC where programmers would not drastically have to change the way they work with current applications.